|
|
|
Financial
Analysis and Valuation of Companies |
|
|
|
The
development of the value of a company is the best long-term measure of
how good a job the present management of a company is doing. There are a
number of situations where a corporate valuation is needed.
These can arise from the early stages in a company’s
development to the very late. Only when understanding Valuation can
sellers begin to understand how to maximize the value of their company.
The financial evaluation process involves both a self-evaluation by the
acquiring company and the evaluation of the candidate for acquisition.
Corporate valuations are carried out in a number of different situations
and for a number of different reasons. Included amongst the most common
needs for valuing a company are: |
|
|
- Raising
capital for growth
- Creating
an incentive program to keep and attract employees
- Executing
a merger, acquisition or divestiture
- Conducting
an initial public offering (IPO)
|
|
A good financial analysis
enables management to answer such questions as: |
|
|
- What
is the maximum price that should be paid for the Target Company?
- What
are the principle areas of risk?
- What
are the earnings, cash flow, and balance sheet implications of the
acquisition?
- What
is the best way to finance the acquisition?
|
|
Maximizing
company value and shareholder wealth is increasingly the most important
task facing today’s manager. At ABCO we understand the importance of
measuring corporate value. Normally a mixture of valuation models are
used in order to get a number of reference points for the valuation
discussion. A stand-alone Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) valuation is used
for a fundamental discussion of the two companies, their operations and
their future earnings potential. In addition, financial and operative
ratios (multiples) are used to allow for effective comparisons in the
discussions and negotiations. The most popular models used by us are: |
|
|
|
Multiples
|
|
|
|
Ratio
based valuations (also called multiple-based valuation) are frequently
used in our valuation of companies. Using this method, the price of an
acquisition is viewed as either a multiple of earnings, book value, cash
flow, etc. Companies with characteristics such as superior sales and
earnings, growth records, better financial returns and prospects,
sustained consistent performance and strong brand franchises will be
acquired for higher multiples. There are two different types of
multiples: fundamental and relative, with relative multiples being the most commonly used. |
|
|
|
In
order to calculate a fundamental multiple one needs to: |
|
|
- Identify
an appropriate variable (i.e. earnings, cash flow) for valuing the
company
- Find
the necessary inputs for the calculation
- Adjust
the numbers if needed
- Compute
the ratio
- Apply
the multiple to estimate the company value or compare it with ratios
for similar companies to view the relative value of the company
|
|
In
order to calculate a relative multiple one needs to: |
|
|
- Identify
an appropriate variable for valuing the company
- Find
comparable companies or industry average with available data
- Adjust
for differences between companies
- Calculate
the ratio of the comparable companies or the industry
- Apply
the ratio of comparable companies or industry average to a chosen
company variable to estimate the company value
|
|
Both
relative and fundamental multiples can then be used to obtain enterprise
and equity
values. If used correctly, using both fundamental and relative
multiples give a good assessment of the value of the company in
question. |
|
|
|
The
use of a multiples is often an expedient way to assess the value of a
company, since the calculation of a multiple is usually uncomplicated
and the data needed for a company and an industry is generally easily
available. |
|
|
|
Discounted
Cash Flow (DCF) |
|
|
|
This
is the most commonly used stand-alone valuation model. It applies not
only to internal growth investments such as additions to existing
capacity, but equally to external growth investments, such as
acquisitions. |
|
|
|
To
establish a maximum acceptable acquisition price under the DCF approach,
estimates are needed for: |
|
|
- The
incremental cash flows expected to be generated as a result of an
acquisition
- The
discount rate or cost of capital, that is the minimum acceptable
rate of return required by the market for new investments by the
company
|
|
In
projecting a cash flow stream of a prospective acquisition, what should
be taken into account is the cash flow contribution the candidate is
expected to make to the acquiring company. Acquisitions generally
provide new postacquisition investment opportunities whose initial
outlays and subsequent benefits also need to be incorporated in the cash
flow schedule. A common practice is to forecast cash flows for 5 to10
years. A better approach suggests that the forecast duration for cash
flows should continue only as long as the expected rate of return on
incremental investment required to support forecasted sales growth
exceed the cost of capital. This is the recommended approach to
acquisition analysis. |
|
|
|
Doing
a DCF valuation can be a cumbersome task and there is usually room for
mistakes. A quick way to check the reasonability of the results from a
DCF valuation can be through comparison with suitable multiples. |
|
|
|
In
arriving at acquisition values we at ABCO go beyond DCF analysis and use
accumulated knowledge and judgement. A thorough knowledge of comparable
precedent transactions, and an up-to-date and accurate assessment of the
wishes, corporate strategies, business economics and peculiarities of
the known and potential participants in any given merger or acquisition
transaction are all essential to this valuation. |
|
|
|
Asset-based
valuation methods |
|
|
|
These
methods attempt to value the company by reference to the value of the
assets held by the company. The simplest method is to use the balance
sheet values of the assets held. A better approach used by us is to use
the current market (net realisable value) value of the assets held by
the company. Whichever method is used will all depend on the
circumstances and purpose of the valuation. For example the orderly
liquidation of a company. An asset stripper (i.e. someone who wishes to
acquire a company with a view to selling off its assets) would probably
be most interested in using these valuation methods. |
|
|
|
These
methods are however likely to present a conservative value, due to the
fact that intangible assets such as goodwill, brand names, etc might not
be recorded on the balance sheet, and would therefore be ignored for the
purpose of valuing the company. It may also be that assets are recorded
at historic costs and therefore below their current market values.
Obviously during a period of inflation, the current market value of
assets held would exceed the historic cost figures. Replacement cost can be used as an indicator of the market value of
the assets held by the business. This approach would take into account
tangible assets such as plant, fixtures, stock, etc as well as the
intangible assets discussed above. |
|
|
|
Conclusion |
|
|
|
In
order to gain insight into a company’s future financial performance,
its’ internal resources, intellectual capital and environment must all
be analysed. The company’s future financial performance is of primary
interest when valuing a company and the past (e.g. last year’s
financial data) is mainly interesting as a guideline for forecasting the
future. The two most common approaches to valuation are the DCF model
and ratio-based valuation. The use of any of the models depends on the
situation and the company’s objectives, as well as the industry the
company is active in, how mature the company is and the required detail
of the valuation. |
|
|
|
However,
more than anything else the process of determining company value,
especially in the early stages depends on the credibility and the track
record of management team, industry opportunity, and of course the
negotiating skills of the parties. Other factors such as historical net
cash flow, the likelihood of continued profitability into the future,
risk, competition, changes in technology, owner non-compete, as well as
working capital requirements, etc are also considered. |
|
|